4 ms·
1) no 2) yes, or if it isn't, facebook is. In the first case, you can't kill blogging short of destroying modern civilization utterly. This is silly. Consider
by ngvrnd 18y ago
1) no
2) yes, or if it isn't, facebook is.
In the first case, you can't kill blogging short of destroying modern civilization utterly. This is silly.
Consider that AM radio is still around, and if you look a little bit harder, you can find people sending morse code on the amateur radio bands.
Ok, maybe "kill" doesn't mean "eliminate". Then you're being sensationalist by using a word that doesn't mean what people think it means.
Secondly, taking the preceding paragraph as read, I find that since I've started using facebook, I have a lot less inclination to post stuff to my blog. I've thought more than once about shutting it down, and frankly the main reason I haven't is inertia.
The reasons for this are at least twofold: one, I think far more people see the stuff I post on facebook, and secondly, nearly all of the five or so people who actually read my wildly popular blog (snort) are also on facebook.