3 ms·
I think it's a broader social problem. People also socialize less in private as well. Atomization, mobile entertainment etc. > The way I see it is that corpora
by bonoboTP 1y ago
I think it's a broader social problem. People also socialize less in private as well. Atomization, mobile entertainment etc.
> The way I see it is that corporate cultures have completely given up on investment in employees. No more tuition reimbursement, no more certification reimbursement, you’re a hired mercenary. They are telling employees straight to their face that they are replaceable temp workers who had better start using AI as much as possible or else they’ll get fired and be replaced with AI anyway.
Chicken-or-egg of course, but employees also tend to job hop much more than before (again, understandable if they can't get a raise otherwise), making investment less rational for companies. It's a self-feeding cycle. People used to work for multiple decades in the same place before that. But probably some MBA books derived that this is bad, because they become too crucial and too unique, bus factor things, you need more fungible cogs than that.
Even in friend groups people are flakier, romantic relationships are treated as more disposable etc. Of course all these have a flipside, they didn't happen without reason. A general shift away from a "high-trust society" model.
- ghaff 1y agoI suspect that outside of executive ranks and probably some other exceptions, staying with the same company mostly didn't result in huge year-to-year raise. BUT jumping companies mostly didn't either. The tech job hop for 2x the money after a couple years is a relatively recent phenomenon for the most part.
- dangus 1y agoIt was also never a move that did anything beyond early career even back in the “good old days.” The whole benefit is that you could convince your next employer that you had senior level experience after spending a short few years as a practitioner.