3 ms·
But that would lock me in to say whatever $debian provides. And some dependencies only exist as source because they are not packaged for $distribution. Of cou
by rootnod3 1y ago
But that would lock me in to say whatever $debian provides. And some dependencies only exist as source because they are not packaged for $distribution.
Of course, if possible, just saying "hey, I need these dependencies from the system" is nicer, but also not error-free. If a system suddenly uses an older or newer version of a dependency, you might also run into trouble.
In either case, you run into either an a) trust problem or b) a maintenance problem. And in that scenario I tend to prefer option b), at least I know exactly whom to blame and who is in charge of fixing it: me.
Also comes down to the language I guess. Common Lisp has a tendency to use source packages anyway.
- skydhash 1y ago> If a system suddenly uses an older or newer version of a dependency, you might also run into trouble. You won't. The user may. On his system.
- rootnod3 1y agoAware of that. So how is that different from any other Debian package? If you rely on a certain set of packages, you are always at the end at fault. You either trust a certain base or you vet it.