3 ms·
> If she committed a felony, she shouldn't be in charge of anything. She should be the POTUS if she's really a felon.
by ahoka 1y ago
> If she committed a felony, she shouldn't be in charge of anything.
She should be the POTUS if she's really a felon.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- phendrenad2 1y agoHaving studied history a bit more than most people, I have a gut reaction to the kind of "lawlessness escalation vortex" where lawlessness by one group is used to excuse lawlessness of an opposing group. I've seen how this ends in history, and it's not good. Essentially, the strongest side wins, takes all of the power, and becomes totalitarian, because who wants to re-institute laws once you're king? Oh, it might be Trump. Or it might be some Bernie Sanders bro. Does it matter in the end, if the laws are gone and we all live as loyal subjects of the crown? But sure, downvote me, shoot the messenger. This is a lesson, I fear, we must learn at the point of the despot's guards spears every 200 or so years, so perhaps there's no avoiding it. But someday, you'll say "damn you phendrenad2, why couldn't you be more convincing, you tried to warn me but not hard enough!"