3 ms·
Isn't that exactly the opposite of the point being made? > software quality doesn't appear because you have good developers
by anonymars 1y ago
Isn't that exactly the opposite of the point being made?
> software quality doesn't appear because you have good developers
- ChrisMarshallNY 1y agoNot really. Good developers are a necessary ingredient of a much larger recipe. People think that a good process means you can toss in crap developers, or that great developers mean that you can have a bad process. In my experience, I worked for a 100-year-old Japanese engineering company that had a decades-long culture of Quality. People stayed at that company for their entire career, and most of them were top-shelf people. They had entire business units, dedicated to process improvement and QA. It was a combination of good talent, good process, and good culture. If any one of them sucks, so does the product.
- ChrisMarshallNY 1y agoIt really is funny how any discussion of improving software quality becomes unpopular, here.
- ponector 1y agoNot only here. Everyone wants to use a quality products, but no almost one is committed to deliver quality products/services. No one is working on quality, everyone works on new features. There is usually no incentive to increase quality, to improve speed, performance, etc.