You would have to be a "controlling body" (per wiki) to engage in censorship. From the article it sounds like Instapaper is a bit player in the world of news an

You would have to be a "controlling body" (per wiki) to engage in censorship. From the article it sounds like Instapaper is a bit player in the world of news and regurgitation thereof. Imagine if you write a news app for the iPhone but never display content from websites you find objectionable. If this means you're engaging in censorship then every bit political blog is guilty of the same. Marco explained that he considered a libel suit, but thought it was an overreaction and instead settled for what he wrongly believed is a middle ground. If you think I am defending Marco's actions then I don't know what to tell you (besides the fact that you misread my comment). My bemusement was at the rampant and sensationalist cries of censorship.