7 ms·
Perhaps it is time that the US stops relying on SSNs being “secret”…
by d--b 1y ago
Perhaps it is time that the US stops relying on SSNs being “secret”…
- XorNot 1y agoED25519 keys being short and quick to generate makes this state of affairs infuriating whenever it turns up - SSNs, credit card numbers etc.
- emsign 1y agoDoesn't change the fact that DOGE are criminal scumbags with root access who did illegal things nobody should ever do. It doesn't matter at all if SSNs were replaced by something decent when young naive and impressionable scumbags with root access and no morals whatsoever will simply steal the data anyway. Quite the contrary even, secure SSN as data loot is even more valuable to the thieves.
- 2OEH8eoCRo0 1y agoThey should be considered unique (public) usernames
- msgodel 1y agoMy understanding is that they're not even guaranteed to be unique.
- datadrivenangel 1y agoYup. They get reused, and people can get new ones or sometimes multiple at the same time...
- Xss3 1y agoWhy? Are they stupid?
- msgodel 1y agoYes. The whole idea is very flawed. It would be good if we got rid of it entirely but most people can't mentally/emotionally/financially handle that so we end up with a lot of bad compromises.
- 2OEH8eoCRo0 1y agoSource? From what I can gather they're supposed to be unique and they don't reuse them. If two people have the same number then it's a mistake.
- datadrivenangel 1y ago"Under a few rare circumstances, SSA may legitimately issue a new SSN to a person with a prior SSN. The conditions are highly restrictive." https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v69n2/v69n2p55.html https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v69n2/v69n2p55.html
- dragonwriter 1y ago> From what I can gather they're supposed to be unique and they don't reuse them. If two people have the same number then it's a mistake. Yes, it is a mistake for two people to be issued the same number and it is unusual for multiple to be issued to the same person. However given the very large volume and the conditions under which things have happened (not just currently but back to 1936!) both mistakes and unusual conditions exist in numbers that cannot be ignored.