23 ms·
Low effort contributions have always, and will ways be, unhelpful. We just now have a tool that generates them EVEN FASTER. :) That must be frustrating for OSS
by cschep 1y ago
Low effort contributions have always, and will ways be, unhelpful. We just now have a tool that generates them EVEN FASTER. :)
That must be frustrating for OSS maintainers, especially when contributing them can meaningfully move the needle on getting jobs, clients, etc.
Definitely makes sense to have rules in place to help dissuade it, but this brave new world isn't going away.
- gerdesj 1y agoBubble goes pop! I'm old enough to remember the global melt down in 2000ish and 2008. Oh and 1991 in the UK - lol, that's when I graduated. Take your money out of AI and stuff it under the mattress (gold if you are a magpie or blue stocks). I have actually just spent out on a fairly handy GPU to stuff into one of our backup boxes at work. It has gobs of RAM and a fairly useful pair of CPUs and sits idle during the day. AI via LLM is a thing but it isn't worth silly money and I think that a wind of change is on the way.
- Towaway69 1y agoAll these GPUs have to be used for something, if it's not AI then its bitcoin, if its not bitcon it's NFTs, if its not NFTs then its Porn. This is a hardware driven bubble that will mutate into the next big computing hype. Server farms have to be doing something because they cost money. So whatever the next big hype is, big-tech will jump on the bandwagon. Hype it 'til you make it.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- DrewADesign 1y ago> All these GPUs have to be used for something They really don’t though. If what they produce becomes less valuable than the electricity it takes to operate the data center they’re housed in, the biggest concern will be figuring out the cheapest way for them to do absolutely nothing.
- r_lee 1y agoWhat do you mean Nvidia isn't worth $4.5 trillion?!
- SchemaLoad 1y agoNot only is it even faster, they now disguise themselves to look like professionally written PRs with advanced understanding of the tech, while being filled with junior level bugs. So you have to super scrutinise it. Which makes me wonder what the point of even taking PRs is, the reviewer could just run the AI themselves and do the same review but not have to go through the process of leaving comments and waiting for the submitter to resolve them.
- Izkata 1y ago> they now disguise themselves I'm imagining a funny possible outcome of this: Code linters/formatters get abandoned so personal style quirks can shine through, making code look visibly "not AI". If the quirks are consistent then it could also hint against it being faked.
- jazzyjackson 1y agoTo prove your humanity one must now make holocaust puns throughout their code
- SchemaLoad 1y agoGrok already has that covered.
- guappa 1y agoGrok isn't joking though
- zulban 1y agoIndeed. OSS maintainers may need some kind of response like the one I've written here that can be strategically dropped on the worst "bad AI" contributions. I certainly wrote this for myself to make my job easier, anyway.