> The thing is, we can sit here on HN thinking we’re so clever This was the precursor to the statement you objected to. It seems pretty central to my point: we

> The thing is, we can sit here on HN thinking we’re so clever This was the precursor to the statement you objected to. It seems pretty central to my point: we only have access to public data and have no experience leading any military campaign. I’m willing to have a discussion to learn more but I’m ultimately going to trust that military people are looking at drone warfare in Ukraine and still trust the F-35 to be good value for money. > based on compromises and several decades in advance. Using drones in war has been a theoretical possibility since at least 2010, so I believe it’s definitely factored into their thinking.