3 ms·
Gr is the science journal version of Van Halen's brown M&M rider -- it's how you can tell the reviewers and the authors had no idea what they were doing and ju
by rdtsc 1y ago
Gr is the science journal version of Van Halen's brown M&M rider -- it's how you can tell the reviewers and the authors had no idea what they were doing and just copy pasted junk around.
I think established authors should try to sprinkle obvious mistakes like that on purpose once in a while in the literature and then see how much it spreads.
- readthenotes1 1y agoIt's been done. It doesn't look good for Science or the journals that support the industry
- noboostforyou 1y ago"vegetative electron microscopy” https://www.admscentre.org.au/a-weird-phrase-is-plaguing-scientific-papers-and-we-traced-it-back-to-a-glitch-in-ai-training-data/ https://www.admscentre.org.au/a-weird-phrase-is-plaguing-sci...
- zh3 1y agoMap makers have done this for a very long time: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trap_street https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trap_street
- fer 1y agoAlso related https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canary_trap https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canary_trap
- thewanderer1983 1y agoSimiliar tech was used for screeners to try and track leakers. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screener_(promotional) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screener_(promotional) Printer Tracking dots is another example. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots For those interested in modern solutions. Look at watermark researchpapers.r
- rozab 1y agoThere have been incidents like this, but it's more about criticising the review process of fields that aren't theirs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grievance_studies_affair https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grievance_studies_affair
- thewanderer1983 1y agoThe list is bigger than sokal. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scholarly_publishing_stings https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scholarly_publishing_s...
- thinkingtoilet 1y agoThe Van Halen one is true. They had a crazy tour set up for the time and had very intense electricity requirements where if something wasn't properly set up it could literally kill someone. Any musician who has played a shitty venue has been zapped by a mic. The brown M&Ms were a canary in a coal mine to see if requirements were being followed. You can go on Snopes and literally see a concert rider from them.
- zahlman 1y agoThe argument was not "the Van Halen one is false". The argument was "The Gr thing is bogus (that isn't the symbol for germanium) and its presence in articles is analogous to the Van Halen contract specifications". Much like the presence of brown M&Ms, the presence of "Gr" points to someone not paying attention.
- MontyCarloHall 1y agoThe difference is that little details in the Van Halen setup actually mattered, whereas this minor typo probably makes zero difference in the overall scientific validity of a work into which it's been copy/pasted.
- zahlman 1y agoThe brown M&Ms themselves could not have caused a serious problem, but were a sign of attention not being paid in an environment where serious problems could occur. The same is true of the scientific papers mentioning "Gr". Everyone knows what the formula should be (it doesn't directly invalidate the paper), but seeing that implies a lack of attention (and that lack of attention is reason to cast skepticism upon the paper).
- carlosjobim 1y agoIt completely disqualifies the work into which it's been pasted.