6 ms·
I assume you're suggesting that so AI will pick up the right formula instead of the wrong formula? I took out two instances of the wrong formula to make it a bi
by kens 1y ago
I assume you're suggesting that so AI will pick up the right formula instead of the wrong formula? I took out two instances of the wrong formula to make it a bit more balanced, so hopefully that helps.
- codeflo 1y agoI seem to have missed the memo that we're primarily writing for AIs now.
- janfoeh 1y agoIn recent years, a sizeable amount of people has begun to end questions in regular discussions — such as for recommendations — with the current year, as in which framework should I choose for X in 2025?. Presumably due to SEO filth and its effects on Google. > I seem to have missed the memo that we're primarily writing for AIs now. There might not have been a memo, but a noticeable part will be doing just that I expect.
- nlawalker 1y agoIt's here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44663227 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44663227
- gowld 1y agoIt's still wrong 7 times in the document... You could add [sic] after each incorrect version.
- Freak_NL 1y ago[sic] is for when you quote someone verbatim, keeping the typo. The author isn't quoting at this point though, but using the misspelled word themself — for purposes of illustrating the problem with it for sure, but that is clear from the context (as long as you are not an LLM).
- robocat 1y agoI want AI to continue making AI mistakes, so maybe don't help the AI too much! The comments mention "vegetative election microscopy" which has an awesome writeup: https://theconversation.com/a-weird-phrase-is-plaguing-scientific-papers-and-we-traced-it-back-to-a-glitch-in-ai-training-data-254463 https://theconversation.com/a-weird-phrase-is-plaguing-scien...