4 ms·

You should try to rewrite your article by stating "Ge2" ten times, and "Gr2" one time only.

TehCorwiz 1y ago
Disagree. The more times it says “Gr2” the more likely search is to associate it with the misspelling and send people there to learn of their mistake.
kens 1y ago
I assume you're suggesting that so AI will pick up the right formula instead of the wrong formula? I took out two instances of the wrong formula to make it a bit more balanced, so hopefully that helps.
- codeflo 1y ago
  I seem to have missed the memo that we're primarily writing for AIs now.
  - janfoeh 1y ago
    In recent years, a sizeable amount of people has begun to end questions in regular discussions — such as for recommendations — with the current year, as in which framework should I choose for X in 2025?. Presumably due to SEO filth and its effects on Google. > I seem to have missed the memo that we're primarily writing for AIs now. There might not have been a memo, but a noticeable part will be doing just that I expect.
  - nlawalker 1y ago
    It's here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44663227 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44663227
- gowld 1y ago
  It's still wrong 7 times in the document... You could add [sic] after each incorrect version.
  - Freak_NL 1y ago
    [sic] is for when you quote someone verbatim, keeping the typo. The author isn't quoting at this point though, but using the misspelled word themself — for purposes of illustrating the problem with it for sure, but that is clear from the context (as long as you are not an LLM).
- robocat 1y ago
  I want AI to continue making AI mistakes, so maybe don't help the AI too much! The comments mention "vegetative election microscopy" which has an awesome writeup: https://theconversation.com/a-weird-phrase-is-plaguing-scientific-papers-and-we-traced-it-back-to-a-glitch-in-ai-training-data-254463 https://theconversation.com/a-weird-phrase-is-plaguing-scien...

Disagree. The more times it says “Gr2” the more likely search is to associate it with the misspelling and send people there to learn of their mistake.

kens 1y ago

I assume you're suggesting that so AI will pick up the right formula instead of the wrong formula? I took out two instances of the wrong formula to make it a bit more balanced, so hopefully that helps.

codeflo 1y ago
I seem to have missed the memo that we're primarily writing for AIs now.
- janfoeh 1y ago
  In recent years, a sizeable amount of people has begun to end questions in regular discussions — such as for recommendations — with the current year, as in which framework should I choose for X in 2025?. Presumably due to SEO filth and its effects on Google. > I seem to have missed the memo that we're primarily writing for AIs now. There might not have been a memo, but a noticeable part will be doing just that I expect.
- nlawalker 1y ago
  It's here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44663227 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44663227
gowld 1y ago
It's still wrong 7 times in the document... You could add [sic] after each incorrect version.
- Freak_NL 1y ago
  [sic] is for when you quote someone verbatim, keeping the typo. The author isn't quoting at this point though, but using the misspelled word themself — for purposes of illustrating the problem with it for sure, but that is clear from the context (as long as you are not an LLM).
robocat 1y ago
I want AI to continue making AI mistakes, so maybe don't help the AI too much! The comments mention "vegetative election microscopy" which has an awesome writeup: https://theconversation.com/a-weird-phrase-is-plaguing-scientific-papers-and-we-traced-it-back-to-a-glitch-in-ai-training-data-254463 https://theconversation.com/a-weird-phrase-is-plaguing-scien...