3 ms·
And Core was a lucky happenstance for Intel as they were not innovating at all and fell behind, thank goodness their isreal lab was doing something other than P
by downrightmike 1y ago
And Core was a lucky happenstance for Intel as they were not innovating at all and fell behind, thank goodness their isreal lab was doing something other than P4 work.
Even recently, we've seen that all intel can do is increase cores and increase power consumption, and they still can't compete. This is itanium all over again, because that is how intel functions.
- bornfreddy 1y agoWell, they do have N100 & co. which are very nice low power x86 devices... Not all is bad that carries their name. But the main question is can they succeed as foundry? We will see in a few years I guess.
- Panzer04 1y agoThis is just doomerism. Intel's current chips are "fine" and competitive with AMD chips. If anything, Intel is trying out more things than AMD is.
- downrightmike 1y ago"Throw shit at the wall and see what sticks", isn't a top tier business strategy, it is desperate though.
- simoncion 1y agoI wouldn't call chips that fault and/or fail after mere months of operation when run within Intel-specified power and thermal parameters to be "fine". Intel may be trying out more things than AMD, but perhaps they shouldn't? Maybe they shouldn't be trying to chase ARM envy with mixed-performance cores and disabling MT and the like and just stick to making reliable CPUs. Honestly, the only thing of Intel's that I'm interested in are their video cards; and that's not because they're good, but because Intel hasn't (yet) all but abandoned their video card business for "AI accelerators"... so there's room for them to become good.