>I do not get the argument of "if nothing happens when an ant bites you then I can shot you with a cannon be cause it is the same thing just larger". this argu

>I do not get the argument of "if nothing happens when an ant bites you then I can shot you with a cannon be cause it is the same thing just larger". this argument fails because at least in the examples provided, it's closer to the non-gen ai denoising/upscaling algorithms than telling chatgpt to upscale an image. >The impact on society matters for me, and it is very different. Justifying AI at any cost is a marketing strategy that will hurt us long-term. There's no indication it's AI, except some vague references to "machine learning".