> They were written later. He could have drafted them himself for all we know. I mean, that's not at all true. You’d have to ignore the same research that tell

> They were written later. He could have drafted them himself for all we know. I mean, that's not at all true. You’d have to ignore the same research that tells us that they were written later in the first place to say we have no information with which to reject that they have a common authorship with the Pauline corpus.