3 ms·

To make sure I wasn't posting out of my ass i opened Gravity's Rainbow to 4 or 5 random pages. All confirmed what I said above. Maybe you should read more wide

To make sure I wasn't posting out of my ass i opened Gravity's Rainbow to 4 or 5 random pages. All confirmed what I said above. Maybe you should read more widely. It's good for the brain!

viccis 1y ago
>Gravity's Rainbow >widely and intensely read prose Dunno about that. Pynchon's prose is notably colloquial, complete with lots of ellipses. Congrats on your Big Boy Book™ though.
- AlecSchueler 1y ago
  This comment is really below the standards one might expect here, a total and hominem. Why don't you open one of your own big boy books and tell us which one it was that used no em dashes?
  - viccis 1y ago
    Oh no I did a and hominem My whole point was that opening "big boy books" doesn't actually make a point about the validity of a thing. That's just argumentum ad populum.
    - AlecSchueler 1y ago
      And what's your argument? YOU have never read any literature that made use of em dashes? But you're showing no evidence of these dashless works at all? N=0 And yes, you made an ad hominem, check the site guidelines. You can make your point without being a dick.
- caconym_ 1y ago
  It's just a book, man. Maybe you should read more widely; it might even cure you of the obscenely stupid opinion you've expressed here.
  - viccis 1y ago
    I'm widely read. Enough that I'm not a pseud trying to imply that I read a lot of super duper hard books as evidence that my midwit opinion on emdashes is better than the guy here who made me mad by criticizing them. Let me know if you're so stoked at reading Infinite Jest that you think that's proof I'm wrong.
    - caconym_ 1y ago
      You made this claim above: > I don't know of any prose that relies on crutch dashes If that's true then you are not widely read, and if it's false then you are a disingenuous troll and your comments here are exactly as worthless as they look. Either way your opinion is still bad. Sorry you're mad about it, but I'm done here.
      - viccis 1y ago
        Good—see ya!

To make sure I wasn't posting out of my ass i opened Gravity's Rainbow to 4 or 5 random pages. All confirmed what I said above. Maybe you should read more widely. It's good for the brain!

viccis 1y ago

>Gravity's Rainbow >widely and intensely read prose Dunno about that. Pynchon's prose is notably colloquial, complete with lots of ellipses. Congrats on your Big Boy Book™ though.

AlecSchueler 1y ago
This comment is really below the standards one might expect here, a total and hominem. Why don't you open one of your own big boy books and tell us which one it was that used no em dashes?
- viccis 1y ago
  Oh no I did a and hominem My whole point was that opening "big boy books" doesn't actually make a point about the validity of a thing. That's just argumentum ad populum.
  - AlecSchueler 1y ago
    And what's your argument? YOU have never read any literature that made use of em dashes? But you're showing no evidence of these dashless works at all? N=0 And yes, you made an ad hominem, check the site guidelines. You can make your point without being a dick.
caconym_ 1y ago
It's just a book, man. Maybe you should read more widely; it might even cure you of the obscenely stupid opinion you've expressed here.
- viccis 1y ago
  I'm widely read. Enough that I'm not a pseud trying to imply that I read a lot of super duper hard books as evidence that my midwit opinion on emdashes is better than the guy here who made me mad by criticizing them. Let me know if you're so stoked at reading Infinite Jest that you think that's proof I'm wrong.
  - caconym_ 1y ago
    You made this claim above: > I don't know of any prose that relies on crutch dashes If that's true then you are not widely read, and if it's false then you are a disingenuous troll and your comments here are exactly as worthless as they look. Either way your opinion is still bad. Sorry you're mad about it, but I'm done here.
    - viccis 1y ago
      Good—see ya!