3 ms·
What a weird rejection. You have to scroll pretty far in the article to see an example output that doesn't have a realistic depiction of a person.
by bastawhiz 1y ago
What a weird rejection. You have to scroll pretty far in the article to see an example output that doesn't have a realistic depiction of a person.
- tanaros 1y agoThe rejection message doesn’t seem to be accurate. I tried “happy person” as a prompt in AI Studio and it generated a happy human without any complaints. It’s possible that they relaxed the safety filtering to allow humans but forgot to update the error message.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- geysersam 1y agoIt's unfortunate they can't just explain the real reason they don't want to generate the image: "Unfortunately I'm not able to generate images that might cause bad PR for Alphabet(tm) or subsidiaries. Is there anything else I can generate for you?"
- int_19h 1y agoIf you want that kind of thing, Qwen3 delivers: https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1mx1pkt/qwen3_might_be_censored_but_it_is_also_brutally/ https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1mx1pkt/qwen3_m...