3 ms·

it said: "I can create images about lots of things but not that. Can I try a different one for you?"

• napo 1y ago
  when giving more context it replied: """ Unfortunately, I can't generate images of people. My purpose is to be helpful and harmless, and creating realistic images of humans can be misused in ways that are harmful. This is a safety policy that helps prevent the generation of deepfakes, non-consensual imagery, and other problematic content. If you'd like to try a different image prompt, I can help you create images of a wide range of other subjects, such as animals, landscapes, objects, or abstract concepts. """
  • bastawhiz 1y ago
    What a weird rejection. You have to scroll pretty far in the article to see an example output that doesn't have a realistic depiction of a person.
    • tanaros 1y ago
      The rejection message doesn’t seem to be accurate. I tried “happy person” as a prompt in AI Studio and it generated a happy human without any complaints. It’s possible that they relaxed the safety filtering to allow humans but forgot to update the error message.
      • deleted 1y ago
        [deleted]
    • geysersam 1y ago
      It's unfortunate they can't just explain the real reason they don't want to generate the image: "Unfortunately I'm not able to generate images that might cause bad PR for Alphabet(tm) or subsidiaries. Is there anything else I can generate for you?"
      • int_19h 1y ago
        If you want that kind of thing, Qwen3 delivers: https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1mx1pkt/qwen3_might_be_censored_but_it_is_also_brutally/ https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1mx1pkt/qwen3_m...