3 ms·
That’s actually what the article says is being addressed, just prioritizing action against the content neutral act. >> therefore cover desecration of a flag st
by ethagknight 1y ago
That’s actually what the article says is being addressed, just prioritizing action against the content neutral act.
>> therefore cover desecration of a flag stolen from government property, or flag burning in a fire hazard zone on federal property.
- estearum 1y agoWhich is also not how Trump and his cronies are talking about the EO. The President "faking" chilling protected speech is exactly the same as chilling protected speech.