4 ms·
The reason why I keep reposting this table is because people post incorrect statements about AMD/Apple so often, often with zero data backing. For Blender numb
by aurareturn 1y ago
The reason why I keep reposting this table is because people post incorrect statements about AMD/Apple so often, often with zero data backing.
For Blender numbers, M4 Pro numbers came from Max Tech's review.[0] I don't remember where I got the Strix Halo numbers from. Could have been from another Youtube video or some old Notebookcheck article.
Anyway, Blender has official GPU benchmark numbers now:
M4 Pro: 2497 [1]
Strix Halo: 1304 [2]
So M4 Pro is roughly 90% faster in the latest Blender. The most likely reason for why Blender's official numbers favors M4 Pro even more is because of more recent optimizations.
Sources:
[0]https://youtu.be/0aLg_a9yrZk?si=NKcx3cl0NVdn4bwk&t=325 https://youtu.be/0aLg_a9yrZk?si=NKcx3cl0NVdn4bwk&t=325
[1] https://opendata.blender.org/devices/Apple%20M4%20Pro%20(GPU%20-%2020%20cores)/ https://opendata.blender.org/devices/Apple%20M4%20Pro%20(GPU...
[2] https://opendata.blender.org/devices/AMD%20Radeon%208060S%20Graphics/ https://opendata.blender.org/devices/AMD%20Radeon%208060S%20...
- vient 1y agoWeren't we comparing CPUs though? Those Blender benchmarks are for GPUs. Here is M4 Max CPU https://opendata.blender.org/devices/Apple%20M4%20Max/ https://opendata.blender.org/devices/Apple%20M4%20Max/ - median score 475 Ryzen MAX+ PRO 395 shows median score 448 (can't link because the site does not seem to cope well with + or / in product names) Resulting in M4 winning by 6%
- aurareturn 1y agoWeren't we comparing CPUs though? Those Blender benchmarks are for GPUs. Yes, but I was asked about Blender GPU. Blender CPU tasks are highly parallel. AMD's Ryzen Max 395 has great MT performance. It's generally 5-20% slower in CPU MT than the M4 Max depending on the application.