2 ms·
This is neat. It's a little hard to compare the best-performing models ("~ 0.00006232g" vs. "~0.00013746g" is not easy at a glance) --- perhaps better to use sc
by niek_pas 1y ago
This is neat. It's a little hard to compare the best-performing models ("~ 0.00006232g" vs. "~0.00013746g" is not easy at a glance) --- perhaps better to use scientific notation, milligrams, or CO2e per 10M tokens?
- aposded 1y agoYou're right! Fixed.