> It's the same reason you don't need to run a double blind study on whether seat belts work Actually, seat belts are a weird example. After they were invente

> It's the same reason you don't need to run a double blind study on whether seat belts work Actually, seat belts are a weird example. After they were invented, there were more car crashes since people trusted they were protected. Without seat belts people were more cautious. They were a net positive of course, but some different situations/inventions/studies might have effects that are the opposite of what you would expect.