3 ms·
Oh well, for GPU programming sure as VRAM is king depending on task. But for gaming I won't go high end again.
by DanielHB 1y ago
Oh well, for GPU programming sure as VRAM is king depending on task. But for gaming I won't go high end again.
- bullen 1y agoI'm all in on 1030, the last passively coolable GPU. But had to upgrade to 3050 because 2GB VRAM is to little for modern titles. Fun fact: One 6600 core can saturate the 1030 for skinned mesh animations. But only saturate the 3050 50% = perfect because the world takes much less CPU (you upload it to the GPU and then it's almost one drawcall; more like one drawcall per chunk but I digress) = OpenGL (ES) can render on it at lower motion-to-photon latency without waste = one core for rendering, one for gameplay, one for physics and one for the OS, audio and networking. So 14nm 6600 + 8nm 3050 is actually the combination I would use for ever. HL:A runs at 90 FPS with that combo too on the low res Vive 1. Not that VR is going anywhere, but still peak demanding application.
- brokenmachine 1y ago>1030, the last passively coolable GPU. Check out the new AMD RX 7400 https://youtu.be/jNfmz0BowxM&t=997 https://youtu.be/jNfmz0BowxM&t=997