Can't they at least get together, hire some tanker lorries and bring in water from somewhere else? Sure, it may be more expensive than the $43k they currently p

Can't they at least get together, hire some tanker lorries and bring in water from somewhere else? Sure, it may be more expensive than the $43k they currently pay, due to transport costs, but at least they will have water. > A more immediate solution is a potential plan to have a private company bring a water tanker to county-owned property in Fort Garland. It seems like the residents are waiting for the local government to take care of this problem (with a potential plan), when they could instead address it directly by co-ordinating with their neighbours, who also need water, to take action.