4 ms·
Your extremely close analogy gets to the crux of why people are disagreeing here: It doesn’t have to be analogy. You can be pointing out an equivalence.
by cgriswald 1y ago
Your extremely close analogy gets to the crux of why people are disagreeing here: It doesn’t have to be analogy. You can be pointing out an equivalence.
- therobots927 1y agoRegardless this was my whole point. The original point was a fallacy: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence
- cgriswald 1y agoI'd be interested in your reason for thinking so but I think you can see your supporting argument is not compelling: > And comparing digging through the ground to human thought and creativity is an odd mix of self debasement and arrogance. > I'm guessing there is an unspoken financial incentive guiding your point of view.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]