2 ms·
It could restrict certain behaviors such as drinking alcohol regardless of location. It could automatically detect bad/criminal behavior that is about to occur
by amichail 1y ago
It could restrict certain behaviors such as drinking alcohol regardless of location.
It could automatically detect bad/criminal behavior that is about to occur and react accordingly.
Ankle monitors can't do that.
- quantified 1y agoYou're not talking about AR in the sense that the wearer is experiencing additional inputs. You're talking about monitoring them and their surroundings. Pure police state infiltration of their environment.
- JohnFen 1y agoIf we really wanted to be that heavy-handed, a body camera could do all that while being far less expensive and far less intrusive. I'm still not seeing the benefit of AR here. What perceptual augmentation do you see as being helpful? But AR system or something short of that, it can't replace imprisoning everybody because it can't stop instantaneous wrongdoing such as many kinds of homicide. Home confinement seems like it would be equally as effective as this sort of thing (and arguably less cruel), without burning all that cash or invading the privacy of all the people the criminal may get near.
- amichail 1y agoIt doesn't need to be AR strictly speaking but it needs to see and understand the criminal's surroundings in real-time via AI and provide feedback to the criminal via visual/audio means and electric shocks.
- JohnFen 1y agoWait, you're proposing putting AI not only in charge of determining if misbehavior happened, but actually able to punish that misbehavior? That seems like an incredibly bad idea. AI is nowhere near being trustworthy enough for that sort of thing. This is sounding a whole like like cruel and unusual punishment to me.
- amichail 1y agoI think most criminals would prefer the occasional electric shocks (even false positives) to being put in a cage.
- CamperBob2 1y ago"I was cured, all right."