3 ms·
CC0 would be in the spirit of what OP envisioned. https://creativecommons.org/public-domain/cc0/ https://creativecommons.org/public-domain/cc0/
by MrGilbert 1y ago
CC0 would be in the spirit of what OP envisioned.
https://creativecommons.org/public-domain/cc0/ https://creativecommons.org/public-domain/cc0/
- liszper 1y agoUpdated to CC0!
- SequoiaHope 1y agoThat’s great! Really cool project too.
- SequoiaHope 1y agoAh right good point, I forgot Creative Commons, which I don’t usually use for code.
- deneas 1y agoThey do actually recommend against using Creative Commons for code and suggest using traditional code licenses instead [1]. [1] https://creativecommons.org/faq/#can-i-apply-a-creative-commons-license-to-software https://creativecommons.org/faq/#can-i-apply-a-creative-comm...
- murderfs 1y agoThey recommend against it for the traditional CC licenses (CC-BY-SA, etc.), but CC0 is perfectly fine for code, since it's basically a dedication to the public domain for jurisdictions that don't support that. The FAQ for CC0 says this explicitly: https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/CC0_FAQ#May_I_apply_CC0_to_computer_software.3F_If_so.2C_is_there_a_recommended_implementation.3F https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/CC0_FAQ#May_I_apply_CC...
- MadnessASAP 1y agoI think the WTFPL is closer https://www.wtfpl.net/txt/copying/ https://www.wtfpl.net/txt/copying/
- bobmcnamara 1y agoThis wasn't in my employers list of acceptable licenses, so I got to go through the efforts of getting it vetted!