4 ms·
This just sounds like a different way of saying "one more lane bro, trust me". Usually one doesn't "shut down" a road, but divert lanes, perform construction ou
by refactor_master 1y ago
This just sounds like a different way of saying "one more lane bro, trust me". Usually one doesn't "shut down" a road, but divert lanes, perform construction outside of peak hours (e.g. at night) etc.
Finally, some people may even consider the construction too much of a hassle and use the car less. Empirical studies suggest that "removing" a road does not cause productivity loss overall, since having the road in the first place induces a lot of "non-essential" demand.
- bluGill 1y agoThat arguement is stupid. the world is not only about productivity. If people want to do something just because they enjoy it then they should. If the lack of a way means they do something else that is a loss. The whole point of Cities is all the options, if you want lack of options there are a lot of small towns - and even they have more options than you want to allow. now it need not be by roads - a great transit system should enable moreeobtions. However the point is all the things you can do if you choose not a train or road to nowhere.