3 ms·
You can (equivalently) distribute some specific libc.so with your application. I don't think anyone other than GNU maximalists believes this infects your appli
by loeg 1y ago
You can (equivalently) distribute some specific libc.so with your application. I don't think anyone other than GNU maximalists believes this infects your application with the (L)GPL.
- Retr0id 1y agoYou'd need to distribute ld.so also, otherwise you'll run into ld/libc incompatibilities.
- cxr 1y ago"GNU maximalist" is an odd choice of wording, since it would seem to imply people who are the most well-informed about the project's licenses, but anyone who thinks that distributing an LGPL library without your own app's corresponding source code is someone who flat out doesn't understand the LGPL.
- cxr 1y agoA mistake in my own wording crept in here; this should have said: > one who thinks that distributing an LGPL library without your own app's corresponding source code is forbidden is someone who flat out doesn't understand the LGPL