3 ms·
If the two photos of Graham come from the same source image, then it looks like the microphone on the first image (http://5.mshcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/0
by domador 14y ago
If the two photos of Graham come from the same source image, then it looks like the microphone on the first image (http://5.mshcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/paul-graham.jpg http://5.mshcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/paul-graham.j...) was airbrushed out (http://venturebeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/pg-lowball.jpg?w=558&h=9999&crop=0 http://venturebeat.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/pg-lowball.jp...). (Unless a microphone was airbrushed in for the first image.) Just thought that was curious, in addition to the desaturation...
- mattmanser 14y agoThe shadow of the mike's been left on the cheek and there's some fairly obvious photoshopping of the wire on the ear and the t-shirt. They've also removed the red-eye and spruced up his eyes.
- darkarmani 14y agoThe second one has shadows by the neck that were blurred to hide the mic shadow. This seems like a lot of image manipulation for a "honest" journalist.
- darkarmani 14y agoHere is the photo credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jolieodell/4525127286/in/photostream/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/jolieodell/4525127286/in/photos... The link from the article links directly to that, and yet they heavily manipulated it and call it journalism.