> It does not protect anyone's privacy unless the recipients believe it was set by a real human being, with a real preference for privacy over personalization.

> It does not protect anyone's privacy unless the recipients believe it was set by a real human being, with a real preference for privacy over personalization. User choosing a particular browser advertising itself as `privacy oriented'† is plenty enough of indication of user's intention. An extra manual action should not be needed. It was an open question whether using OS' default browser could be considered a valid choice, but not anymore. On Windows, users are prompted to select a browser, via BrowserChoice.eu. † yea, I know it is quite ironic to call IE a privacy-oriented browser. Still, it should not be singled out for any perceived shortcomings.