3 ms·
Okay, how this changes the core argument? The videos were not taken down briefly because they did not comply with the Turkish law that protects Ataturk from def
by mrtksn 1y ago
Okay, how this changes the core argument? The videos were not taken down briefly because they did not comply with the Turkish law that protects Ataturk from defamation but for the claim that they violated someones commercial interests.
- mannykannot 1y agoAs the claim you made about copyright being used to take down a video was completely false, how did it contribute to anything?
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- nani8ot 1y agoThe video wasn't taken down over commercial interests. They were taken down because some old law prohibited insults at representatives of other nations, with whom Germany has diplomatic relationships. https://archive.is/wWvwM https://archive.is/wWvwM