3 ms·
From the future perspective, yes. From the perspective of characters at the time, they wouldn't use that nomenclature, since it didn't exist yet. They would rat
by bdcravens 1y ago
From the future perspective, yes. From the perspective of characters at the time, they wouldn't use that nomenclature, since it didn't exist yet. They would rather use the numbering system of their time (in this case, years since the establishment of Rome)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ab_urbe_condita https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ab_urbe_condita
- bryanrasmussen 1y agoI believe this was what people call a "joke"
- pimlottc 1y agoCeci-la, c’est la blague
- lovecg 1y agoI had a thought once that no one ever lived in year one except retroactively (with some exceptions like the French Revolution). By the time a new system is adopted, it’s already been a while since the defining event.
- merelysounds 1y agoAnother possible exception: systems where year one happens repeatedly, e.g. Japanese era calendar scheme.
- kergonath 1y ago> with some exceptions like the French Revolution It was also the case for the French Revolution. The republican calendar was established in year II. Nobody living in year I knew it at the time.