>Traditionally in the west censorship was through copyright rights. It wasn’t considered censorship if you do it for money and business. To me, those 2 sentenc

>Traditionally in the west censorship was through copyright rights. It wasn’t considered censorship if you do it for money and business. To me, those 2 sentences contradict each other. Doing it through copyright rights, and doing it for money and business sound pretty much the same to me. But you're saying that traditionally one wasn't considered censorship, but the other was considered censorship.