4 ms·

Yeah, open weights but with tons of limitations in the license. https://huggingface.co/xai-org/grok-2/blob/main/LICENSE https://huggingface.co/xai-org/grok-2/bl

by Permik 1y ago

Yeah, open weights but with tons of limitations in the license. https://huggingface.co/xai-org/grok-2/blob/main/LICENSE https://huggingface.co/xai-org/grok-2/blob/main/LICENSE

riedel 1y ago
What of those are unreasonable terms? Quickly looking into it, it seems mostly that it is restricted to legal use and the provider has to take some responsibility.
- piperswe 1y ago
  Those limitations mean: - Not open "source" because source isn't available - Not "open" weights because there are restrictions on use This model is weights-available. There's nothing open about it.
  - puilp0502 1y ago
    Doesn't this apply to most of the "open-weight" models like Llama and Gemma? I remember Llama also having some specific terms targeted at big boi players as well.
    - piperswe 1y ago
      Correct. There are just about zero open models out there.
pxc 1y ago
Maybe we should have a parallel designation for this like "weights available", because this license is quite restrictive and really not comparable to models with weights released under, e.g., Apache or MIT licenses.