4 ms·

IO bound compiler would be weird. Memory, perhaps, but newer CPUs also tend to be able to communicate with RAM faster, so... I think just having LSP give you a

by mordae 1y ago

IO bound compiler would be weird. Memory, perhaps, but newer CPUs also tend to be able to communicate with RAM faster, so... I think just having LSP give you answers 2x faster would be great for staying in flow.

crinkly 1y ago
Compiler is usually IO bound on windows due to NTFS and the small files in MFT and lock contention problem. If you put everything on a ReFS volume it goes a lot faster. Applies to git operations as well.
- blibble 1y ago
  by "IO bound" you mean "MS defender bound"
  - hypercube33 1y ago
    Dev Drive can help with that as well
cout 1y ago
I've seen gcc+ld use a large amount of disk (dozens of GB) during LTO.