3 ms·
I wish; KIP-500[1] was the "let's use native Raft" implementation but I have never once in my life seen anyone using Kafka in KIP-500 mode 1: https://cwiki.apa
by mdaniel 1y ago
I wish; KIP-500[1] was the "let's use native Raft" implementation but I have never once in my life seen anyone using Kafka in KIP-500 mode
1: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/kafka/kip-500:+replace+zookeeper+with+a+self-managed+metadata+quorum https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/kafka/kip-500:+r...
- enether 1y agoConfluent has shared they've migrated thousands of Kafka clusters (their whole cloud fleet) to KIP-500 https://www.confluent.io/blog/zookeeper-to-kraft-with-confluent-kubernetes/ https://www.confluent.io/blog/zookeeper-to-kraft-with-conflu...
- 62951413 1y agoVery few people want to re-create their production AWS MSK cluster from scratch. And that's the only way currently. MSK can usually upgrade Kafka brokers with minor performance degradation but not for this particular change.