3 ms·
Curious that you can "mix" PT & EU functionals (with perceptron) but not the corresponding "decision-making mechanisms"..? (I might have missed an explicit de
by gsf_emergency_2 1y ago
Curious that you can "mix"
PT & EU functionals (with perceptron) but not the corresponding "decision-making mechanisms"..?
(I might have missed an explicit description of these "decision-making mechanisms" in the paper)
>we find that the ... most complex class ... lies outside the simple classes
Another curious statenent
- timshell 1y ago> Curious that you can "mix" PT & EU functionals (with perceptron) but not the corresponding "decision-making mechanisms"..? Great push. We actually can't make any mechanistic claims from the data/math in this paper. From an ML prediction standpoint, we're mixing a PT and EU theory together. But to what extent that is the actual cognitive process we have to remain agnostic about. That being said, a reason this arbitration between EU and PT is intriguing is because there's a lot of work about arbitration between dual process models in psychology (System 1 and 2; model-free and model-based; labor versus leisure; etc.)