4 ms·
Which in turn is maybe because they are unwilling to offer sufficient compensation. You get what you pay for but this time the tables have turned and it's a big
by martin-t 1y ago
Which in turn is maybe because they are unwilling to offer sufficient compensation. You get what you pay for but this time the tables have turned and it's a big corp getting shafted.
This is not a mom and pop shop struggling to keep the lights on. This is a huge corporation whose CEO has a net worth 4 orders of magnitude greater than the median American of his age. He could pay the whole IT department out of his pocket and barely notice.
I don't feel bad for them.
- brianwawok 1y agoI’m not sure a drink company throwing 200-500k at a few security hires is going to really do anything. Who is there to validate the quality of these guys?
- martin-t 1y agoHow does any company manage to hire competents with this attitude?
- gnarlouse 1y agoLooks like Bobdahacker took this blog post down lol
- SOLAR_FIELDS 1y agoYou can pay someone to validate your hires too. Probably 200-500k is cheap compared to this embarrassment
- akerl_ 1y agoIs this “embarrassment” going to cost them anything at all?