If you're studying the association between aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines and chronic childhood disorders, wouldn't you need to exclude children who couldn' t hav

If you're studying the association between aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines and chronic childhood disorders, wouldn't you need to exclude children who couldn' t have chronic disorders due to being dead? It would skew the numbers down, since you'd have to count dead children as not having any chronic disorders, right? It's doesn't seem "on-point" to me. It looks illogical, unreasoned, and emotional to me. Seems clear he's rejecting evidence that doesn't affirm his preexisting viewpoint without engaging with the content.