> There are a lot of seemingly valid problems pointed out with it. As I said, if the problems are indeed valid then a new analysis will show it. Otherwise, it'

> There are a lot of seemingly valid problems pointed out with it. As I said, if the problems are indeed valid then a new analysis will show it. Otherwise, it's all speculations, and that is simply not enough. Science isn't built on speculations but on hard data, and this standard is not negotiable. Saying "sounds about right", shrugging and calling it a day is just not acceptable.