2 ms·
That seems arbitrary. Why can’t you simply point out problems with the current study? That seems valid enough to invalidate the study.
by SilverElfin 1y ago
That seems arbitrary. Why can’t you simply point out problems with the current study? That seems valid enough to invalidate the study.
- warkdarrior 1y agoBecause an arguably flawed methodology does not necessarily lead to flawed results. You need another study with correct methodology to show that the results are flawed.
- rpdillon 1y agoScience is a structured way of doing exactly that. It's designed to avoid a lot of the manipulation that is present in non-scientific discussions, like, exactly the kind of manipulation we're talking about here. It's not perfect, but at least it's trying.
- ranger_danger 1y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method