4 ms·
I wouldn't be surprised if their lack of any response is because they literally have noone to deal with this. They can't seem to fill (or hold) some pretty impo
by sigmoid10 1y ago
I wouldn't be surprised if their lack of any response is because they literally have noone to deal with this. They can't seem to fill (or hold) some pretty important IT roles:
https://recruiting2.ultipro.com/MON1009MECY/JobBoard/682eaab7-c9b0-4800-bffb-24b736ad7746/?q=&o=postedDateDesc&f5=9EGXbUpdwUabYntwg8YrLg https://recruiting2.ultipro.com/MON1009MECY/JobBoard/682eaab...
- martin-t 1y agoWhich in turn is maybe because they are unwilling to offer sufficient compensation. You get what you pay for but this time the tables have turned and it's a big corp getting shafted. This is not a mom and pop shop struggling to keep the lights on. This is a huge corporation whose CEO has a net worth 4 orders of magnitude greater than the median American of his age. He could pay the whole IT department out of his pocket and barely notice. I don't feel bad for them.
- brianwawok 1y agoI’m not sure a drink company throwing 200-500k at a few security hires is going to really do anything. Who is there to validate the quality of these guys?
- martin-t 1y agoHow does any company manage to hire competents with this attitude?
- gnarlouse 1y agoLooks like Bobdahacker took this blog post down lol
- SOLAR_FIELDS 1y agoYou can pay someone to validate your hires too. Probably 200-500k is cheap compared to this embarrassment
- akerl_ 1y agoIs this “embarrassment” going to cost them anything at all?