I understand that Aeon is for those who enjoy the act of reading. Even still it would be appreciated to have clearer foundations. Between this false dichotomy

I understand that Aeon is for those who enjoy the act of reading. Even still it would be appreciated to have clearer foundations. Between this false dichotomy good/evil, and the implicit premise that thermodynamics has a meaning, it's all word salad to me. > Reality is good. > But what would our metaphysics and ethics look like if we learned that reality was against us? I prefer the view of Samsara in Buddhism as the endless, cyclic process--a framework describing the continuous cycle of existence with no inherent or ultimate meaning or purpose within itself. The cycle operates according to mechanistic laws. Maybe I'm just triggered, gatekeeping thermodynamics as a topic that literary folk shouldn't be having feelings about? Get off my lawn!