5 ms·
Having seen the posts about the new IO interface, I decided to steer clear from Zig. Looks like that fortuitious instinct was proven valid as this looks more an
by noobermin 1y ago
Having seen the posts about the new IO interface, I decided to steer clear from Zig. Looks like that fortuitious instinct was proven valid as this looks more and more like the verbosity from pre C++11 for different reasons but with a similar result.
This pattern (new language evolves to be as complex as the languages it was supposed to replace) seems familiar.
- ivanjermakov 1y agoAs being one of the post authors you mentioned, I don't think such posts should scare people from trying it out. Zig team is eager to discuss and break things if a better solution is found. Such approach is not a great fit for those who treat Zig as a future job opportunity, but for personal and small-team projects it's _already_ a neat language with clear goals and great tooling.