3 ms·
The blogpost is transparently an advertisement, which is ironic considering the author's last blogpost was https://blog.efitz.net/blog/modern-advertising-is-lit
by yifanl 1y ago
The blogpost is transparently an advertisement, which is ironic considering the author's last blogpost was https://blog.efitz.net/blog/modern-advertising-is-litter/ https://blog.efitz.net/blog/modern-advertising-is-litter/
- theshrike79 1y agoIn this case the lunch is being paid by VC money. I acknowledge that and get like $400 worth of tokens from my $20 Claude Code Pro subscription every month. I'm building tools I can use when the VC money runs out or a clear winner gets on top and the prices shoot up to realistic levels. At that point I've hopefully got enough local compute to run a local model though.
- efitz 1y agoOP here. I was not solicited by anyone nor did I solicit or accept compensation from anyone for this or any other post. It’s not an advertisement; I apologize if I come off as a Claude Code fanboy. If you read part 1 of my post (linked in my OP) you will see that I disclosed exactly how much I paid for my usage, and also the reasons that I ended up choosing Claude Code over other agents.