5 ms·
Because Google provides (or used to provide) a fast consistent interface for a lot of basic queries. Sure, if I'm researching etymology in depth then I'll go to
by DharmaPolice 1y ago
Because Google provides (or used to provide) a fast consistent interface for a lot of basic queries. Sure, if I'm researching etymology in depth then I'll go to a specialist site, but 90%+ of the time I'm just double checking the definition of a word or something like that.
In general, internet browsing is biased towards sites that you're familiar with and can be reasonably sure aren't going to do something annoying (it used to be popup adverts and auto playing music, now days it's popups about newsletters / memberships or aggressive notifications about cookies / privacy notices.). This is particularly true if you ever spent time browsing in an open plan office or similar public place. There's also a cognitive load of interacting with a new interface which isn't something you want to deal with if you're midflow and want to check a word.
This is not to say that those sites you mentioned are guilty of bad practices, but the point is I'm not a regular enough user of them to have them on my mental "generally trust" list.
- breve 1y agoThis is precisely the abdication of thinking I'm talking about. Your claim that merely using a different website is an unacceptable cognitive load is truly bizarre to me. It is a form of illiteracy.
- tbrownaw 1y ago> abdication of thinking I want <X>. How do I expend the least amount of effort to get a good-enough <X>?
- torben-friis 1y agoHow much intelligence have you gained from accessing the same information in a slightly more convoluted way?