3 ms·
You can polyfill this with JavaScript though? It's incorrect to say there are no removals, as we do not have <MARQUEE> anymore.
by miohtama 1y ago
You can polyfill this with JavaScript though?
It's incorrect to say there are no removals, as we do not have <MARQUEE> anymore.
- frosted-flakes 1y agoYes we do. https://caniuse.com/mdn-html_elements_marquee https://caniuse.com/mdn-html_elements_marquee The marquee element is deprecated but is supported by all major Web browsers.
- ksherlock 1y agoWith xml/xslt, the browser fetches, eg, somefile.xml that looks like: <?xml version="1.0"?> <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="somefile.xsl"?> ... Then the browser fetch somefile.xsl and uses that to transform the xml into html (which is then rendered as per the uzhe). Whether the browser does all that in C or C++ or Rust or Javascript or by sending it to an LLM is an implementation detail. If the browser drops xslt support and just displays it as text (or syntax-hilighted xml), I, as the xml author, can't polyfill that by adding javascript to the xml because it won't be executed. You need to back up a level. You could set up a web page that fetches the xml and fetch the xslt and transforms it into html and then displays it (so a browser in your browser so you can browse while you browse) but I wouldn't call that a polyfill exactly. If you're going to do that, it would be less work and a better user experience to do the transform server side.
- Izkata 1y agoWebservers can push CSS through headers, I wonder if that works with javascript too...
- 8NNTt8z3QvLT8tp 1y agohttps://github.com/mfreed7/xslt_polyfill/pull/5 https://github.com/mfreed7/xslt_polyfill/pull/5 - someone's made a PR that looks like it would allow Mason's polyfill to work directly from the XML file.