2 ms·
> To get such a majority, even "the others" would have to be bothered by <something> so much, that they would be willing to go out and vote Forcing mandatory a
by mschuster91 1y ago
> To get such a majority, even "the others" would have to be bothered by <something> so much, that they would be willing to go out and vote
Forcing mandatory attendance for HOA votes won't work out, that's the thing. Too many cases of remote landlords, properties stuck in inheritance limbo, or even First Amendment issues (can you be compelled to make speech, aka participate in a vote?). Requiring a "70% of all owner shares" would flat out kill most HOAs, and requiring a "70% of present owner shares" perpetuates the status quo of giving disproportionate amounts of power to the usual suspects.
- ajsnigrutin 1y agoSo, no vote then, no action, same as in every other non-HOA neighborhood. But if something bothers 70%+ of people enough to come and vote, it gets resolved HOA-style.