> intellectually dishonest Your claim here is that the author's argument is intentionally misleading. That's an awfully strong accusation, and you don't suppor

> intellectually dishonest Your claim here is that the author's argument is intentionally misleading. That's an awfully strong accusation, and you don't support it in your comment. You're also immediately undermining your own argument when you go on to list difficulties in rust that javascript doesn't have.